tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3910701108066928587.post6240944812275447673..comments2023-07-27T02:27:46.701-07:00Comments on PASS4SURE CCNA: QUESTION 22 Refer to the exhibit. Which three statements correctly describe Network Device A?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3910701108066928587.post-78056434849130656682018-06-03T15:24:40.128-07:002018-06-03T15:24:40.128-07:00Awww Thanks dude. You're a life saver man! Cou...Awww Thanks dude. You're a life saver man! Couldn't be better explained than this. All those who don't understand should go through this explanationRay :-)https://www.blogger.com/profile/04725918509010064148noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3910701108066928587.post-6757146641149441542017-06-12T02:09:04.796-07:002017-06-12T02:09:04.796-07:00I just couldn't leave your website before tell...I just couldn't leave your website before telling you that I truly enjoyed the top quality info you present to your visitors? Will be back again frequently to check up on new posts.<br /><a href="http://www.londonittraining.co.uk/ccna-training-courses-london" rel="nofollow">ccna training london</a><br />juanjuergenshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03100195918263372267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3910701108066928587.post-32520025204262979752014-03-22T13:17:40.928-07:002014-03-22T13:17:40.928-07:00Answer: B D E
Explanation
The principle here is ...Answer: B D E<br /><br />Explanation<br /><br />The principle here is if the subnet mask makes two IP addresses 10.1.0.36 and 10.1.1.70 in the same subnet then the Network device A does not need to have IP addresses on its interfaces (and we don’t need a Layer 3 device here).<br /><br />A quick way to find out the correct answers is notice that all 255.255.255.x subnet masks will separate these two IP addresses into two separate subnets so we need a Layer 3 device here and each interface must require an IP address on a unique IP subnet -> A, C are not correct while B, D are correct.<br /><br />With 255.255.254.0 subnet mask, the increment here is 2 in the third octet -> the first subnet is from 10.1.0.0 to 10.1.1.255, in which two above IP addresses belong to -> each interface of Network device A does not require an IP address -> E is correct.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07117290013647490129noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3910701108066928587.post-26338563377369059102013-10-23T07:43:22.353-07:002013-10-23T07:43:22.353-07:00excellent as I understand. And they do not underst...excellent as I understand. And they do not understand should review the ccna again.kiarahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04720657179626177878noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3910701108066928587.post-5598910570008353892013-03-27T23:20:52.826-07:002013-03-27T23:20:52.826-07:00This is perfect explanation, can't be more spe...This is perfect explanation, can't be more specific that this...... Thank you.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10555641946743608975noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3910701108066928587.post-86355069018970583822013-02-07T05:21:30.838-08:002013-02-07T05:21:30.838-08:00*10.1.0*.36 | 10.1.1.70 (according to the subnet ...*10.1.0*.36 | 10.1.1.70 (according to the subnet mask *255.255.255*.128 , we can see two hosts go in to differnt subnets because x.x.0.36 & x.x.1.70 (first 3 should be same ,but here it's not )so we need <br />each interface does require an IP address on a unique IP subnet. (B) correct<br />--------------------------------------------<br />because of the same reason (255.255.255.0) again we need a layer 3 device such as router to communicate with in different subnets so (D)correct<br />-------------------------------------------<br />with a network wide mask of 255.255.254.0 first 2 octet same x.x.254.0 .which means now the two hosts in same subnets because (10.1 & 10.1) so we don't need layer 3 device to communicate.and no need any configuration changes (a ip address).they can communicate each other because there in the same subnets .so (E) correct<br /><br />A C Wrongtumalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03176093002228881637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3910701108066928587.post-90443480606270473342012-09-27T18:54:57.856-07:002012-09-27T18:54:57.856-07:00OMG, Explanation can't be clearer than this. I...OMG, Explanation can't be clearer than this. If you don't understand, I recommend both of you to take networking 101. <br /><br />Sorry to be harsh on both of you but who ever wrote it, did a good job. Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16491617440814870798noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3910701108066928587.post-23116871594233115832012-07-16T15:40:27.275-07:002012-07-16T15:40:27.275-07:00yes, The explanation is not very clear
It should h...yes, The explanation is not very clear<br />It should have been more detailed.<br /><br />Thanks a lotAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10578004909278574526noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3910701108066928587.post-89542311377804965002011-08-24T08:14:54.443-07:002011-08-24T08:14:54.443-07:00sorry your explain not clear ..sorry your explain not clear ..abo taweelahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12152439476211420191noreply@blogger.com